AI products are defective and dangerous. Why are we using them at all?
Original article ↗ 🔒 Paywalled source — limited preview availableB.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER LEFT
LEFTCENTERRIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
0.00 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.000 · CENTER
Ensemble
-0.500 · CENTER LEFT
🏦 Source Intelligence
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER
avg -0.104
10,364 articles tracked
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Article Excerpt
OPINION
AI products are defective and dangerous. Why are we using them at all?
VASS BEDNAR
SPECIAL TO THE GLOBE AND MAIL
PUBLISHED MAY 6, 2026
Open this photo in gallery:
Students in France look at OpenAI's ChatGPT app on their phones. As digital products, AI models are excluded from some provisions of the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act.
SEBASTIEN BOZON/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
COMMENTS
SHARE
SAVE FOR LATER
Listen to this article
Learn more about audio
Log in or create a free account to listen to this article.
Vass Bednar is the managing director of the Canadian Shield Institute and co-autho…
Read full article at The Globe and Mail ↗
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Analyzed by
B.I.A.S.
V.E.R.I.F.Y.
L.O.C.A.L.
pending
Jul 15, 2026