LIVE · 41 SOURCES
News Activity Log Weather Economy Municipal 🏙 Blindspot Divergence Owners 🏢 MPs 🏛 Cost of Parliament 💵 Markets 📈 Accountability Chain 🔗 Cross-Watch 🔗 Team Governance Methodology Score Education API Subscribe to What The Fact Sign in →
The Globe and Mail 🏢 Globe and Mail Inc. (Woodbridge) May 14, 2026 · 6 min read Quick Score ○ Unverifiable View full audit trail → C.R.E.E.D. audited

Donner Prize nominees break down their big ideas, from AI to immigration

Original article ↗ 🔒 Paywalled source — limited preview available
B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER
LEFTCENTERRIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3) 0.00 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT) 0.259 · RIGHT
Ensemble 0.130 · CENTER
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate · Globe and Mail Inc. (Woodbridge)
CA
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER
avg -0.104
10,358 articles tracked
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
🔒
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Article Excerpt
Donner Prize nominees break down their big ideas, from AI to immigration BRAD WHEELER PUBLISHED MAY 14, 2026 COMMENTS SHARE SAVE FOR LATER Listen to this article Learn more about audio Log in or create a free account to listen to this article. On May 14, the annual $60,000 Donner Prize for the best public policy book by a Canadian will be awarded at a gala dinner in Toronto. The shortlisted authors, including Globe and Mail columnists John Ibbitson and Tony Keller, were asked to identify a misunderstood issue or misguided policy related to their books and explain the importance of getting …
Read full article at The Globe and Mail ↗
How we scored this article

WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.

Full audit trail for this article →