Active Management Performs Much Better Than SPIVA U.S. Scorecard States, Finds New Academic Study
Original article ↗ 🔒 Paywalled source — limited preview availableB.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER
LEFTCENTERRIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
0.00 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.000 · CENTER
Ensemble
0.000 · CENTER
🏦 Source Intelligence
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER
avg -0.054
2,788 articles tracked
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Article Excerpt
IAA’s Active Managers Council Appoints New Chair and Vice-Chair WASHINGTON, May 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — A new study released today argues that the SPIVA U.S. Scorecard “consistently and substantially” understates the performance of actively managed funds due to certain “empirical choices” in its methodology. The study, titled “How the SPIVA U.S. Scorecard Understates the...
Read full article at Montreal Gazette ↗
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Analyzed by
B.I.A.S.
V.E.R.I.F.Y.
L.O.C.A.L.
quick v1 + full
May 27, 2026