New study names the best place to ride out a global catastrophe. It isn’t Canada
Original article ↗ Paywalled source — limited preview availableB.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER LEFT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
0.00 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.000 · CENTER
Ensemble
-0.350 · CENTER LEFT
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate
· Postmedia
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.398
2,851 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
📄 Related Gov Tenders
Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
🏛 Related Parliament Votes
Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
🏙 Related Municipal Events
Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
Article Excerpt
Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Breadcrumb Trail Links
HomeNewsScience
New study names the best place to ride out a global catastrophe. It isn't Canada
The lead author says agriculture in Canada ceases almost completely in many nuclear winter scenarios
Author of the article:
By Mason Kossak
Published Aug 26, 2026
4 minute read
Join the conversation
A windblown, empty municipal road during winter. Bryan Schlosser
Article content
Australia is the country most often named as best able to ride out a global catastrophe. Canada is on the other side of the ledger.
Article content
Florian Ulrich Jehn is the lead author of the first review to map which places on Earth would hold up best in a global catastrophe, published Aug. 23 in the journal Global Challenges.
Article content
Article content
The paper defines a global catastrophic risk as the death of a significant share of humanity, most commonly at least 10 per cent of the world’s population within months to years. It reviews 152 documents rather than modelling anything new.
Article content
Article content
The authors sorted those threats three ways with the first being sunlight reduction scenarios. That is the review’s term for anything that suddenly blocks out the sun, whether a nuclear war, a large volcanic eruption or an asteroid strike.
Article content
NP Posted
Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.
Sign Up
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Article content
Another is infrastructure loss, usually a long blackout caused by a solar storm, a cyberattack or an electromagnetic pulse from a nuclear weapon detonated at high altitude. The third is a pandemic severe enough to cause mass casualties.
Article content
“In many nuclear winter scenarios agriculture ceases almost completely in Canada,” Jehn said in an email to National Post.
Article content
Canada is strong on biological threats and mediocre on infrastructure collapse, he wrote, and “probably near the worst among wealthy democracies for abrupt sunlight reduction scenarios.”
Article content
Australia is the only country directly named as resilient across all three categories in the research the authors reviewed. New Zealand and Japan were the only others with evidence in all three.
Article content
On nuclear winter, the review…
Read full article at National Post ↗
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Cite this analysis