LIVE · 42 SOURCES
Search stories, MPs, sources
News
Latest news Full archive Activity log Weather Blindspot Divergence Clusters
Politics
Political parties MPs, Senate & ridings Promise tracker Municipal Lobbying Appointments Ethics tracker Officers
Elections
Election calendar Candidates & races Platforms & promises Party records Federal Provincial Municipal Coverage readiness Ridings
Money
Economy Bank of Canada rates Cost of Parliament Global Affairs spending Debt tracker Where the money goes Markets
Media
Sources Owners Journalists CRTC Echo — slogans & phrases
Data
Coverage map Accountability chain Cross-Watch Claims Developer API Education API Search everything
About
Methodology The newsroom Governance & ethics C.R.E.E.D. Media literacy Score an article Subscribe to What The Fact Sign in →
Read better, not just more

Media literacy

A short set of habits that make this site — and any news site — easier to read critically. None of them require trusting us.

1. Read the cluster, not the article

One account of an event is one framing of it. Open the cluster and the omissions become visible immediately: what led here that was buried there, whose words were quoted directly and whose were paraphrased.

2. Check who is quoted directly

Direct quotation is an editorial choice. The people quoted in their own words are the people the outlet is treating as credible; the people paraphrased are being summarised by someone with a view.

3. Separate the fact from the frame

Two outlets can agree completely on what happened and disagree completely on what it means. Divergence on facts is checkable. Divergence on meaning is a matter for you.

4. Notice the absence

A story that is everywhere on one side and nowhere on the other is telling you something about both sides. That is what the blindspot page is for.

5. Distrust a single number

A figure quoted without its release date and its source table cannot be checked. If a number matters to the argument, find the table.