LIVE · 39 SOURCES
Search stories, MPs, sources
News
Latest news Full archive Activity log Weather Blindspot Divergence Clusters
Politics
Political parties MPs, Senate & ridings Municipal Lobbying Appointments Ethics tracker Officers
Elections
Election calendar Candidates & races Ridings directory Candidate search Party records Federal Provincial Municipal Coverage readiness Ridings
Money
Economy Bank of Canada rates Cost of Parliament Global Affairs spending Debt tracker Where the money goes Markets
Media
Sources Owners Journalists CRTC Echo — slogans & phrases
Data
Coverage map Accountability chain Cross-Watch Claims Canadian History Atlas Developer API Education API Search everything
About
Methodology The newsroom Governance & ethics C.R.E.E.D. Media literacy Score an article Subscribe to What The Fact Sign in →
← Back to News
The Conversation Canada 📰 The Conversation (academic) Sep 13, 2026 · 6 min read AI Analyzed ○ Unverifiable View full audit trail → C.R.E.E.D. audited

Sharing non‑consensual ‘deepfake’ porn in Canada is now a crime. The law still fails the victims

Original article ↗
Named in this story
MCGILL UNIVERSITY●
Matched by name against the article text. ● also tracked in another Watch product.
Key figures
The law still fails the victims Published: September 13, 2026 8.15am EDT Share article Print article In June 2026, the Canadian government passed a groundbreaking reform of the Criminal Code — the Protecting Victims Act (Bill C-16).
That same month, Parliament amended the Elections Act to address political deepfakes in Bill C-25 and tabled the Safe Social Media Act (Bill C-34) — a major initiative looking to regulate social media and chatbot services.
The industry built around “nudifying” apps was valued at US$36 million per year in 2025.
It has involved multiple large-scale scandals, such as the one in early 2026 when the social media platform X’s chatbot Grok generated up to 200 non-consensual sexualized deepfakes per minute, including 23,000 images that appeared to depict children.
Bill C-34 even explicitly states: “Nothing in this Act requires an operator to proactively search content on a regulated service that it operates in order to identify harmful content.” This is, again, misaligned with the nature of deepfake-based sexual abuse.
Quoted verbatim from the article — not summarised.
B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER
LEFTCENTERRIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3) -0.20 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT) 0.000 · CENTER
Ensemble 0.000 · CENTER
🏦 Source Intelligence
📰 Media · The Conversation (academic)
CA
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.286
from 66 scored articles · last 30d
608 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
    Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
    📄 Related Gov Tenders
      Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
      🏛 Related Parliament Votes
        Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
        🔗 Cross-Watch
        Named in this story — also tracked across the Watch Series.
        🏙 Related Municipal Events
          Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
          Excerpt from The Conversation Canada
          To count as illegal “intimate imagery,” under Canadian law, a depiction has to be realistic enough to pass as a genuine photo or video, regardless of whether the individual is identifiable or has consented to its use. (Unsplash/Mohamed Nohassi) Sharing non‑consensual ‘deepfake’ porn in Canada is now a crime. The law still fails the victims Published: September 13, 2026 8.15am EDT Share article Print article In June 2026, the Canadian government passed a groundbreaking reform of the Criminal Code — the Protecting Victims Act (Bill C-16).…

          What The Fact analyses coverage; it does not republish it. This is a short excerpt — the article stays with The Conversation Canada.

          Read full article at The Conversation Canada ↗
          How we scored this article

          WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.

          Full audit trail for this article →

          Cite this analysis