Peter MacKinnon: Don’t denigrate academics for telling the truth about DEI
Original article ↗ Paywalled source — limited preview availableB.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
-0.50 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.000 · CENTER
Ensemble
0.000 · CENTER
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate
· Postmedia
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.398
2,851 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
📄 Related Gov Tenders
Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
🏛 Related Parliament Votes
Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
🏙 Related Municipal Events
Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
Article Excerpt
Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Breadcrumb Trail Links
HomeNP Comment
Peter MacKinnon: Don't denigrate academics for telling the truth about DEI
Researchers aren't 'racist' for reaching conclusions you don't like
Author of the article:
By Peter MacKinnon
Published Sep 21, 2026
Last updated 11 minutes ago
1 minute read
Join the conversation
University of Michigan students walk on the UM campus next to signage displaying the University's "Core Values" on April 3, 2025 in Ann Arbor, Michigan. PHOTO BY BILL PUGLIANO/GETTY IMAGES
Article content
Alex Usher is an experienced observer of post-secondary education in Canada and so his letter to the Macdonald-Laurier Institute on its recent study of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) hires attracts our attention. In that letter, Usher denounces the research and conclusions of three researchers on the subject: they are, he says, driven by “gutter social science” and called their work “a drive-by smear” that some would call “clearly racist and sexist.”
Article content
Article content
Usher takes issue with the researchers’ comparisons of the research productivity of different groups of scholars favoured by DEI, and of those that are not favoured at all. From this study, readers might conclude that Usher’s attack is not well founded. One of the authors wrote a full rebuttal.
Article content
RECOMMENDED VIDEOS
Article content
Channel Israel
Columnist Jesse Kline keeps you up to date with what’s happening in Israel and the effects of antisemitism on life here in Canada. Friday mornings.
Sign Up
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Article content
DEI leads to discrimination against individuals in favour of increasing participation from identities (race, colour, gender, etc.) that are said to be equity-deserving. In Canada, this discrimination is pervasive and long-standing, and contrary to Section 15(1) of the Charter, though ostensibly saved by the wide scope of affirmative action permitted by Section 15(2).
Article content
It is not surprising that the impact of DEI on academia is now under review. That is what the MLI researchers did, and readers are free to take issue with their methodology and conclusions. They are not free, however, to denigrate the authors and the organization for which they worked.
Article content
Usher’s attack illustrates the…
Read full article at National Post ↗
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Cite this analysis