LIVE · 41 SOURCES
Search stories, MPs, sources
News
Latest news Full archive Activity log Weather Blindspot Divergence Clusters
Politics
Political parties MPs, Senate & ridings Municipal Lobbying Appointments Ethics tracker Officers
Elections
Election calendar Candidates & races Ridings directory Candidate search Party records Federal Provincial Municipal Coverage readiness Ridings
Money
Economy Bank of Canada rates Cost of Parliament Global Affairs spending Debt tracker Where the money goes Markets
Media
Sources Owners Journalists CRTC Echo — slogans & phrases
Data
Coverage map Accountability chain Cross-Watch Claims Developer API Education API Search everything
About
Methodology The newsroom Governance & ethics C.R.E.E.D. Media literacy Score an article Subscribe to What The Fact Sign in →
← Back to News
National Post 🏢 Postmedia Sep 21, 2026 · 4 min read AI Analyzed ○ Unverifiable View full audit trail → C.R.E.E.D. audited

Peter MacKinnon: Don’t denigrate academics for telling the truth about DEI

Original article ↗ Paywalled source — limited preview available
B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER
LEFTCENTERRIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3) -0.50 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT) 0.000 · CENTER
Ensemble 0.000 · CENTER
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate · Postmedia
CA
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.398
from 536 scored articles · last 30d
2,851 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
    Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
    📄 Related Gov Tenders
      Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
      🏛 Related Parliament Votes
        Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
        🏙 Related Municipal Events
          Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
          Article Excerpt
          Advertisement 1 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Breadcrumb Trail Links HomeNP Comment Peter MacKinnon: Don't denigrate academics for telling the truth about DEI Researchers aren't 'racist' for reaching conclusions you don't like Author of the article: By Peter MacKinnon Published Sep 21, 2026 Last updated 11 minutes ago 1 minute read Join the conversation University of Michigan students walk on the UM campus next to signage displaying the University's "Core Values" on April 3, 2025 in Ann Arbor, Michigan. PHOTO BY BILL PUGLIANO/GETTY IMAGES Article content Alex Usher is an experienced observer of post-secondary education in Canada and so his letter to the Macdonald-Laurier Institute on its recent study of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) hires attracts our attention. In that letter, Usher denounces the research and conclusions of three researchers on the subject: they are, he says, driven by “gutter social science” and called their work “a drive-by smear” that some would call “clearly racist and sexist.” Article content Article content Usher takes issue with the researchers’ comparisons of the research productivity of different groups of scholars favoured by DEI, and of those that are not favoured at all. From this study, readers might conclude that Usher’s attack is not well founded. One of the authors wrote a full rebuttal. Article content RECOMMENDED VIDEOS Article content Channel Israel Columnist Jesse Kline keeps you up to date with what’s happening in Israel and the effects of antisemitism on life here in Canada. Friday mornings. Sign Up By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Article content DEI leads to discrimination against individuals in favour of increasing participation from identities (race, colour, gender, etc.) that are said to be equity-deserving. In Canada, this discrimination is pervasive and long-standing, and contrary to Section 15(1) of the Charter, though ostensibly saved by the wide scope of affirmative action permitted by Section 15(2). Article content It is not surprising that the impact of DEI on academia is now under review. That is what the MLI researchers did, and readers are free to take issue with their methodology and conclusions. They are not free, however, to denigrate the authors and the organization for which they worked. Article content Usher’s attack illustrates the…
          Read full article at National Post ↗
          How we scored this article

          WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.

          Full audit trail for this article →

          Cite this analysis