LIVE · 41 SOURCES
Search stories, MPs, sources
News
Latest news Full archive Activity log Weather Blindspot Divergence Clusters
Politics
Political parties MPs, Senate & ridings Municipal Lobbying Appointments Ethics tracker Officers
Elections
Election calendar Candidates & races Ridings directory Candidate search Party records Federal Provincial Municipal Coverage readiness Ridings
Money
Economy Bank of Canada rates Cost of Parliament Global Affairs spending Debt tracker Where the money goes Markets
Media
Sources Owners Journalists CRTC Echo — slogans & phrases
Data
Coverage map Accountability chain Cross-Watch Claims Developer API Education API Search everything
About
Methodology The newsroom Governance & ethics C.R.E.E.D. Media literacy Score an article Subscribe to What The Fact Sign in →
← Back to News
The Globe and Mail 🏢 Globe and Mail Inc. (Woodbridge) 📍 ON Sep 21, 2026 · 5 min read AI Analyzed View full audit trail → C.R.E.E.D. audited

A dark truth that Ottawa hid for too long

Original article ↗ Paywalled source — limited preview available
B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER RIGHT
LEFTCENTERRIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3) -0.40 · LEFT
ML v2 (DistilBERT) 0.327 · RIGHT
Ensemble 0.327 · CENTER RIGHT
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate · Globe and Mail Inc. (Woodbridge)
CA
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.250
from 2,179 scored articles · last 30d
14,075 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
🔍 Intelligence Feed
    Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
    📄 Related Gov Tenders
      Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
      🏛 Related Parliament Votes
        Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
        🏙 Related Municipal Events
          Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
          Article Excerpt
          OPINION A dark truth that Ottawa hid for too long THE EDITORIAL BOARD PUBLISHED 7 MINUTES AGO COMMENTS SHARE SAVE FOR LATER The wonderful thing about the courts is that, at their best, they cut through the speculative, the specious and the downright bogus when governments defend the keeping of certain secrets. And that is what Federal Court Justice Simon Fothergill did this month when the Canadian government sought to preserve redactions in a historian’s report about Nazi war criminals in Canada. The redactions mostly concerned events of more than 70 years ago, when U.S. intelligence agencies helped Nazi collaborators settle in Canada. Open this photo in gallery: The cover of the Rodal Report, Nazi War Criminals in Canada: The Historical and Policy Setting from the 1940s to the Present. SUPPLIED It’s an important subject. As the historian, Alti Rodal, wrote in her report, it was a formative period in Canada’s history that cast a shadow over subsequent decades. It’s painful to consider that at a time Canada was still barring most Jewish refugees from Europe, it was opening its doors to Nazi collaborators from Eastern Europe. If now isn’t the time to open up the secrets of that past, when? Under federal law, the onus is on Ottawa to show that public disclosure would cause injury – for instance, to national security, or relationships with other governments. Injury, in legal terms, does not mean embarrassment to the country, to the government or to individuals. It isn’t meant to forestall an understanding of our history. It’s striking how long this powerful, even hair-raising, report was kept under wraps. Forty years ago, Ms. Rodal was director of historical research for the 1985 Deschênes Commission of Inquiry on Nazi war criminals in Canada. As late as 2023, only a heavily redacted version of her 600-page report was available. Good for B’nai Brith Canada, a Jewish advocacy group, for fighting for the redactions to be dropped, pressing Library and Archives Canada, then the Office of the Information Commissioner, and finally Federal Court. Some redactions were dropped before the case reached the court. Those that remained included descriptions of historical events, statistical information and the names, roles and duties of foreign intelligence officials. As Ms. Rodal wrote, a U.S. army branch that was a cover for the CIA persuaded Canadian immigration officials not to conduct background checks on some individuals with criminal records, including…
          Read full article at The Globe and Mail ↗
          How we scored this article

          WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.

          Full audit trail for this article →

          Cite this analysis