LIVE · 42 SOURCES
Search stories, MPs, sources
News
Latest news Full archive Activity log Weather Blindspot Divergence Clusters
Politics
Political parties MPs, Senate & ridings Municipal Lobbying Appointments Ethics tracker Officers
Elections
Election calendar Candidates & races Ridings directory Candidate search Party records Federal Provincial Municipal Coverage readiness Ridings
Money
Economy Bank of Canada rates Cost of Parliament Global Affairs spending Debt tracker Where the money goes Markets
Media
Sources Owners Journalists CRTC Echo — slogans & phrases
Data
Coverage map Accountability chain Cross-Watch Claims Developer API Education API Search everything
About
Methodology The newsroom Governance & ethics C.R.E.E.D. Media literacy Score an article Subscribe to What The Fact Sign in →
← Back to News
The Conversation Canada 📰 The Conversation (academic) Sep 23, 2026 · 7 min read AI Analyzed ○ Unverifiable View full audit trail → C.R.E.E.D. audited

Half of new parents have unwanted, intrusive thoughts of harming their infants. Research suggests most aren’t dangerous.

Original article ↗
Named in this story
UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA●
Matched by name against the article text. ● also tracked in another Watch product.
Key figures
Our research with colleagues has found that 99 per cent of new birthing parents (mothers and birthing parents of other genders) have some unwanted, intrusive thoughts of accidental harm coming to their newborn infant.
Approximately 50 per cent experience some unwanted, intrusive thoughts of harming their infant on purpose.
Almost everyone (about 95 per cent) has occasional unwanted, intrusive thoughts that they find morally repugnant because the content of the thoughts goes against their wishes, values and beliefs.
Postpartum psychosis affects approximately one to two out of every 1,000 birthing parents.
That is in stark contrast with unwanted, intrusive thoughts of infant-related intentional harm, which are reported by 500 or more per 1,000 birthing parents.
Quoted verbatim from the article — not summarised.
B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER
LEFTCENTERRIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3) -0.20 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT) 0.000 · CENTER
Ensemble 0.000 · CENTER
🏦 Source Intelligence
📰 Media · The Conversation (academic)
CA
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.336
from 74 scored articles · last 30d
469 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
    Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
    📄 Related Gov Tenders
      Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
      🏛 Related Parliament Votes
        Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
        🔗 Cross-Watch
        Named in this story — also tracked across the Watch Series.
        🏙 Related Municipal Events
          Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
          Article Excerpt
          Studies show that parents who reported these thoughts were no more likely to engage in physical aggression toward their infant than parents who did not report having them. (Unsplash) Half of new parents have unwanted, intrusive thoughts of harming their infants. Research suggests most aren’t dangerous. Published: September 23, 2026 9.27am EDT Share article Print article Imagine you are standing near the railing of a seventh-floor balcony with your infant in your arms when a sudden thought crosses your mind: you could drop your baby over the edge. How does that make you feel? What are you likely to do? Now imagine you see your baby lying on his play mat on the floor, and you have a sudden image of stepping on them on purpose. Are you worried you are unwell? A bad parent or, worse, a dangerous one? This is the experience of many new parents. Our research with colleagues has found that 99 per cent of new birthing parents (mothers and birthing parents of other genders) have some unwanted, intrusive thoughts of accidental harm coming to their newborn infant. Approximately 50 per cent experience some unwanted, intrusive thoughts of harming their infant on purpose. Unwanted, intrusive thoughts are those that pop into a person’s mind unexpectedly. They are a common human experience. Almost everyone (about 95 per cent) has occasional unwanted, intrusive thoughts that they find morally repugnant because the content of the thoughts goes against their wishes, values and beliefs. These kinds of thoughts are more common when we’re stressed, and they typically reflect what preoccupies us, what we’re afraid of and what we most want to avoid. Does this sound like new parents? They are stressed, preoccupied with their baby and strongly motivated to keep their infant safe. Thinking about harm is not doing it The thing most people worry about is whether unwanted, intrusive thoughts of infant-related harm signal a risk to the baby’s safety — the possibility that the parent might act on these thoughts. My lab, the Perinatal Anxiety Research Lab (PARLab) at the University of British Columbia, has conducted the only two studies addressing this question. Across both studies, parents who reported unwanted, intrusive thoughts of harming their infant on purpose were no more likely to engage in physical aggression toward their infant than parents who did not report these thoughts. An animated, educational video about unwanted, intrusive postpartum thoughts of…
          Read full article at The Conversation Canada ↗
          How we scored this article

          WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.

          Full audit trail for this article →

          Cite this analysis