One-fifth of MPs’ speeches in the House of Commons are written with AI help, analysis finds
Original article ↗ Paywalled source — limited preview availableB.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER RIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
0.00 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.325 · RIGHT
Ensemble
0.325 · CENTER RIGHT
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate
· Globe and Mail Inc. (Woodbridge)
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.251
14,068 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
📄 Related Gov Tenders
Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
🏛 Related Parliament Votes
Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
🏙 Related Municipal Events
Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
Article Excerpt
One-fifth of MPs’ speeches in the House of Commons are written with AI help, analysis finds
MARIE WOOLF
PUBLISHED 1 HOUR AGO
COMMENTS
SHARE
SAVE FOR LATER
Listen to this article
Learn more about audio
Log in or create a free account to listen to this article.
One-fifth of the words spoken in the House of Commons by MPs in the past year were written with the help of AI, an analysis by the Economist magazine has found.
The study using Pangram, a tool for detecting text written by artificial intelligence, found that Canadian MPs were the second-highest users of AI to write speeches in parliamentary debates, after Australia.
Twenty per cent of verbal contributions by Canadian MPs were written with the help of AI compared with 21 per cent for Australian MPs, according to the Economist analysis in this week’s edition. Ottawa’s use was more prevalent than among elected representatives in England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, the U.S. and New Zealand.
The study, which analyzed speeches made in the year since September, 2025, in selected English-speaking legislatures, found that Canadian MPs used AI tools to craft speeches, ask and reply to questions and make other verbal interventions.
The use of AI is not prohibited under parliamentary rules in Ottawa and the Speaker of the House of Commons declined to comment on its prolific use.
Canada signs international statement on AI safety, joining calls for stronger oversight
But former NDP MP Charlie Angus, who was known for his fiery oratory, said “on first glance it just shows how mediocre we have become in that we have to ask Claude or ChatGPT what they think first.”
“Canadian MPs are asking Claude how to ask a dumb 30-second question to the minister, and how to get their zingers on tax policy.” But MPs and ministers are failing to address the dangers potentially posed by AI to humanity, he said.
Mr. Angus, who has been writing articles about the potential threats posed by superintelligent AI, said “red lights are flashing everywhere about threats posed by AI” and “yet you have dead silence in the Canadian Parliament” about the risks posed.
Former NDP MP Kennedy Stewart, who is now an associate professor at Simon Fraser University’s School of Public Policy, said he was not worried by the prolific use of AI by Canadian MPs.
Mr. Stewart, who studies AI use in government, said Canadian MPs seemed far more bound to talking points issued by party managers than MPs in other parliaments.
From doomsday warnings…
Read full article at The Globe and Mail ↗
Local coverage · Ontario
Last 14 days, matched on province.
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Cite this analysis