LIVE · 41 SOURCES
Search stories, MPs, sources
News
Latest news Full archive Activity log Weather Blindspot Divergence Clusters
Politics
Political parties MPs, Senate & ridings Municipal Lobbying Appointments Ethics tracker Officers
Elections
Election calendar Candidates & races Ridings directory Candidate search Party records Federal Provincial Municipal Coverage readiness Ridings
Money
Economy Bank of Canada rates Cost of Parliament Global Affairs spending Debt tracker Where the money goes Markets
Media
Sources Owners Journalists CRTC Echo — slogans & phrases
Data
Coverage map Accountability chain Cross-Watch Claims Developer API Education API Search everything
About
Methodology The newsroom Governance & ethics C.R.E.E.D. Media literacy Score an article Subscribe to What The Fact Sign in →
← Back to News
The Globe and Mail 🏢 Globe and Mail Inc. (Woodbridge) 📍 ON Sep 24, 2026 · 5 min read Quick Score ○ Unverifiable View full audit trail → C.R.E.E.D. audited

One-fifth of MPs’ speeches in the House of Commons are written with AI help, analysis finds

Original article ↗ Paywalled source — limited preview available
B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER RIGHT
LEFTCENTERRIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3) 0.00 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT) 0.325 · RIGHT
Ensemble 0.325 · CENTER RIGHT
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate · Globe and Mail Inc. (Woodbridge)
CA
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.251
from 2,187 scored articles · last 30d
14,068 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
    Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
    📄 Related Gov Tenders
      Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
      🏛 Related Parliament Votes
        Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
        🏙 Related Municipal Events
          Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
          Article Excerpt
          One-fifth of MPs’ speeches in the House of Commons are written with AI help, analysis finds MARIE WOOLF PUBLISHED 1 HOUR AGO COMMENTS SHARE SAVE FOR LATER Listen to this article Learn more about audio Log in or create a free account to listen to this article. One-fifth of the words spoken in the House of Commons by MPs in the past year were written with the help of AI, an analysis by the Economist magazine has found. The study using Pangram, a tool for detecting text written by artificial intelligence, found that Canadian MPs were the second-highest users of AI to write speeches in parliamentary debates, after Australia. Twenty per cent of verbal contributions by Canadian MPs were written with the help of AI compared with 21 per cent for Australian MPs, according to the Economist analysis in this week’s edition. Ottawa’s use was more prevalent than among elected representatives in England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, the U.S. and New Zealand. The study, which analyzed speeches made in the year since September, 2025, in selected English-speaking legislatures, found that Canadian MPs used AI tools to craft speeches, ask and reply to questions and make other verbal interventions. The use of AI is not prohibited under parliamentary rules in Ottawa and the Speaker of the House of Commons declined to comment on its prolific use. Canada signs international statement on AI safety, joining calls for stronger oversight But former NDP MP Charlie Angus, who was known for his fiery oratory, said “on first glance it just shows how mediocre we have become in that we have to ask Claude or ChatGPT what they think first.” “Canadian MPs are asking Claude how to ask a dumb 30-second question to the minister, and how to get their zingers on tax policy.” But MPs and ministers are failing to address the dangers potentially posed by AI to humanity, he said. Mr. Angus, who has been writing articles about the potential threats posed by superintelligent AI, said “red lights are flashing everywhere about threats posed by AI” and “yet you have dead silence in the Canadian Parliament” about the risks posed. Former NDP MP Kennedy Stewart, who is now an associate professor at Simon Fraser University’s School of Public Policy, said he was not worried by the prolific use of AI by Canadian MPs. Mr. Stewart, who studies AI use in government, said Canadian MPs seemed far more bound to talking points issued by party managers than MPs in other parliaments. From doomsday warnings…
          Read full article at The Globe and Mail ↗
          How we scored this article

          WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.

          Full audit trail for this article →

          Cite this analysis