Biased survey on lifting the shale gas moratorium
Original article ↗B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER RIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
-0.60 · LEFT
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.410 · RIGHT
Ensemble
0.410 · CENTER RIGHT
🏦 Source Intelligence
📰 Media
· NB Media Co-op
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.474
214 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
🔍 Intelligence Feed
Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
📄 Related Gov Tenders
Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
🏛 Related Parliament Votes
Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
🏙 Related Municipal Events
Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
Excerpt from NB Media Co-op
On October 7, as part of its public review of lifting the shale gas moratorium, the government launched a survey on “natural gas development” in New Brunswick. As independent academic experts in survey methodology and discourse analysis, we believe this survey is problematic in several ways, which we detail below. These issues demonstrate a bias […]
What The Fact analyses coverage; it does not republish it. This is a short excerpt — the article stays with NB Media Co-op.
Read full article at NB Media Co-op ↗
Local coverage · New Brunswick
Last 14 days, matched on province.
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Cite this analysis