Stories where outlets on both sides of the spectrum covered the same event but disagree
on a specific, checkable point — not just tone. Each dispute shows whether a document
has already resolved it.
Disputes in window5last 30 days · showing 5 most recent
Called when6+ outletsspans both L and R lean, checkable point found
NewsAlert: Cold Lake First Nations seeks judicial review of pipeline designation
indigenous · 8 articles
Not yet checkedDivergence 20
In dispute: Global News frames the story as Cold Lake First Nations seeking a judicial review of the Pacific Link pipeline designation, while The Globe and Mail simply states they are pushing for a judicial review without specifying which pipeline.
L 3C 4R 1
Reads it one way · 3 articles
“Cold Lake First Nations seeks judicial review of pipeline designation”APTN National News
“NewsAlert: Cold Lake First Nations seeks judicial review of pipeline designation - Toronto Star”Toronto Star
“Cold Lake First Nations seeks judicial review of Pacific Link pipeline designation”Global News
Reads it the other · 1 article
“Cold Lake First Nations push for judicial review of pipeline designation”The Globe and Mail
A story qualifies when at least 6 outlets covered it and the coverage spans both sides of
the political spectrum (left+center-left and center-right+right). V.E.R.I.F.Y. is then
asked whether the outlets disagree on a specific, checkable point — a "disagreement on
tone" finds no dispute. Divergence score (0-100) measures how far apart the coverage leans,
independent of whether a checkable point was found. See coverage blind
spots for the related "one side stayed silent entirely" signal.