CH-0078 · RESEARCH DRAFT
Marshall treaty fishing decisions
The Supreme Court affirmed a treaty right to pursue a moderate livelihood and clarified that justified regulation can apply.
Not publication-ready. This is not an unrestricted commercial fishing entitlement or a general finding on all land title.
- Historical place
- Atlantic treaty territories
- Present-day context
- Atlantic treaty territories — navigation aid, not historical jurisdiction
- Peoples named in this record
- Mi’kmaq, Other treaty nations, Canada
- Review state
- source supported draft — source-supported draft is not independent verification
- Catalogue updated
- 2026-10-11
- French text
- Translation pending; English research text shown.
Map context
No territorial polygon or coordinate is asserted in v1. Modern location labels are orientation aids, not historical boundaries.
Source evidence
-
R. v. Marshall clarification
Supreme Court of Canada · court decision · Review: search excerpt
Recorded retrieval date: 2026-10-11. This date does not prove a complete document was reviewed.
Institutional interpretation is not automatically independent corroboration. Consult nation-authored histories and underlying records before editorial approval.