Why patients trust fake doctor reviews online over real ones, and how that's a health risk
Original article ↗ Paywalled source — limited preview availableB.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
-0.20 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.000 · CENTER
Ensemble
0.000 · CENTER
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate
· Postmedia
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER
avg -0.161
1,896 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
📄 Related Gov Tenders
Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
🏛 Related Parliament Votes
Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
🏙 Related Municipal Events
Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
Article Excerpt
Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Breadcrumb Trail Links
HomeHealthLocal HealthNewsLocal News
Why patients trust fake doctor reviews online over real ones, and how that's a health risk
'Deceptive reviews,' often generated by AI, can influence decisions about who patients trust with their care, says the author of a new SFU study
Author of the article:
By Tiffany Crawford
Published Sep 08, 2026
Last updated 15 hours ago
3 minute read
Join the conversation
A new SFU study raises concerns about fake reviews for health clinics. PHOTO BY GORODENKOFF /Getty Images/iStockphoto
Article content
Health-care patients are more likely to believe fake online reviews for a doctor over a genuine comment, raising concerns about the quality of care they may receive, according to a new study from Simon Fraser University.
Article content
“Sometimes it’s pretty easy to say, ‘Oh this doctor is great because he has 100 positive reviews.’ But would most clinics even have 100 reviews? That’s a red flag,” said Aishwarya Deep Shukla, associate professor at SFU’s Beedie School of Business and lead author of the study.
Article content
Article content
Article content
The analysis, published in Internet Research, looked at 35,000 reviews that spanned medical specialties from family medicine to dentistry and dermatology. Of those, researchers confirmed about 24 per cent were fraudulent by using a system that checks email identification.
Article content
Sunrise
Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion.
Sign Up
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Article content
Researchers also analyzed patients’ responses to determine how trustworthy the reviews were, and what they discovered was that fake reviews had the highest trustworthy score.
Article content
Shukla said this is because the fake reviews typically provide more detail that make the patient believe the clinic has helped with specific concerns. For example, the reviewer might describe intimate details of a debilitating knee condition that couldn’t be treated anywhere else but at a specific clinic.
Article content
“So they would generally weave a very believable story that this is a patient who has gone through this, is really an expert, and then they would describe their symptoms. Some of them even list medications, which is not something most…
Read full article at Vancouver Sun ↗
Local coverage · British Columbia
Last 14 days, matched on province.
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Cite this analysis