‘Marketing material’ on Sisson mine needs to be scrutinized: critic
Original article ↗B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER RIGHT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
-0.20 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.329 · RIGHT
Ensemble
0.329 · CENTER RIGHT
🏦 Source Intelligence
📰 Media
· NB Media Co-op
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER LEFT
avg -0.585
157 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
📄 Related Gov Tenders
Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
🏛 Related Parliament Votes
Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
🏙 Related Municipal Events
Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
Article Excerpt
Groups opposed to a big new mine in central New Brunswick are demanding that the provincial government scrutinize the project’s latest plans, including changes to a tailings pond and massive earthen dam that would hold back toxic wastewater. Northcliff Resources, a firm in Vancouver, recently published a summary of a new feasibility study that showed […]
Read full article at NB Media Co-op ↗
Local coverage · British Columbia
Last 14 days, matched on province.
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Cite this analysis