Opinion: If treaties are the highest form of reconciliation, why all the anti-treaty noise?
Original article ↗ Paywalled source — limited preview availableNamed in this story
Gary Anandasangaree
Pierre Poilievre●
Matched by name against the article text.
● also tracked in another Watch product.
B.I.A.S. ANALYSIS
CENTER LEFT
Signal breakdown
Heuristic (v1/v3)
-0.20 · CENTER
ML v2 (DistilBERT)
0.353 · RIGHT
Ensemble
-0.324 · CENTER LEFT
🏦 Source Intelligence
🏢 Corporate
· Postmedia
Rolling outlet bias
CENTER
avg -0.161
1,896 articles tracked all-time
7-day bias trend
LcenterR
V.E.R.I.F.Y. has fact-checked this article.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
Subscribe to see claim-by-claim verdicts and reasoning.
🔍 Intelligence Feed
Cross-Watch · Gov · Parliament · Legal · Civic
📄 Related Gov Tenders
Via Gov Watch · CanadaBuys + PSPC tenders
🏛 Related Parliament Votes
Via Civic Watch · OpenParliament.ca
🔗 Cross-Watch
Named in this story — also tracked across the Watch Series.
Pierre Poilievre person
Civic
🏙 Related Municipal Events
Via Civic Watch · City council, bylaws & permits
Article Excerpt
Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Breadcrumb Trail Links
HomeOpinionOp-Ed
Opinion: If treaties are the highest form of reconciliation, why all the anti-treaty noise?
Murray Rankin and Mark L. Stevenson: Part of the answer may lie in wedge politics, public confusion, and the government’s controversial response to DRIPA. Four concerns deserve answers
Author of the article:
By Murray Rankin, Mark L. Stevenson
Published Sep 22, 2026
Last updated 1 hour ago
4 minute read
Chief negotiators signed the Kitselas Treaty, the product of 30 years of work, in June 2024. From far left, Cyril Bennett-Nabess, deputy chief councillor of Kitselas FN. Seated, from left: Frank Osentarp, federal chief negotiator; Glenn Bennett, chief of Kitselas First Nation; Mark Lofthouse, B.C. chief negotiator. Standing, from left: Gary Anandasangaree, then minister of crown — Indigenous relations and northern affairs; Susan Bevan, Kitselas citizen; and Murray Rankin, then B.C. minister of Indigenous relations and reconciliation. PHOTO BY GOVERNMENT OF B.C.
Article content
For decades, politicians of every stripe have called modern treaties the highest form of reconciliation between First Nations and the Crown. Treaties replace conflict with agreement, uncertainty with clarity, and unresolved claims with durable rules.
Article content
Why, after decades of cross-party support, are three hard-won treaties now a source of alarm?
Article content
Article content
K’ómoks, Kitselas and Kitsumkalum each ratified a treaty in 2025 after roughly 30 years of negotiation, with overwhelming member support. The B.C. legislature enacted the K’ómoks Treaty Act this spring, but only after raucous debate. It now moves to Parliament, where Pierre Poilievre says Conservative MPs will oppose the implementing legislation.
Article content
Article content
The Kitselas Treaty Act requires further debate; Kitsumkalum will follow.
Article content
Sunrise
Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion.
Sign Up
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Article content
The treaties’ purpose has not changed; certainty for the Crown and private property owners as well as greater access to lands and resources for the First Nations. These agreements were negotiated by the First Nations, Canada and B.C., and endorsed by the Nations’ members.
Article…
Read full article at Vancouver Sun ↗
Local coverage · British Columbia
Last 14 days, matched on province.
How we scored this article
WTF uses a two-tier system: every article gets a heuristic bias score from keyword analysis, and priority articles (high overlap across 3+ outlets or strong heuristic signal) get full LLM analysis from B.I.A.S. and V.E.R.I.F.Y.
Cite this analysis